Thursday, December 30, 2010

WSJ on Italian Women Strive to Snap Stereotype

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703326204575616391028975592.html

Barbara Haislip Answers Questions About Succession, Business Plans and Tracking Down Female Investors

Upfront

Barbara Haislip Answers Questions About Succession, Business Plans and Tracking Down Female Investors 


Q: What happens in a family business when it is getting close to a time when succession needs to be planned for, but the generation in control does not, or cannot, let go emotionally?
Skip Weisman
Poughkeepsie, N.Y.

A: One way to clear the air and ease the transition is to plot out the resources and capabilities of the firm, says Robert Nason, assistant director of the STEP Project for Family Enterprising at Babson College in Wellesley, Mass.

Forbes on Q&A: Pipeline Fund’s Natalia Oberti Noguera

ForbesWoman

Q&A: Pipeline Fund’s Natalia Oberti Noguera

Dec. 17 2010 - 9:42 am
Natalia Oberti Noguera wants to build an army of women angel investors—which she believes will change the world. In January, her social venture investment fund, Pipeline Fund, which launched in the summer of 2010, will begin its first fellowship program, a six-month intensive to train women philanthropists for investing in women-led, for-profit socially-rooted startups.
At just 27, Oberti Noguera has an economics degree from Yale and a history of nonprofit work, having spent time with Net Impact where she learned about both CSR and sustainability. She is well-spoken and confident in her business plan—and her vision for changing the face of the investment community. ForbesWoman spoke to her about the dearth of women working as angel investors, and how she plans on bettering the world’s marketplace by giving more women a seat at the table and a hold on the world’s investment purse strings.


http://blogs.forbes.com/meghancasserly/2010/12/17/finance-angel-investment-pipeline-funds-natalia-oberti-noguera/

Rich women in the Financial Times

Rich women

Published: December 22 2010 09:48 | Last updated: December 22 2010 15:51

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3/9328fdc4-0db0-11e0-8b53-00144feabdc0.html
If women’s pay reflects national values, America must be a nation of litigious pill poppers. The Bureau for Labor Statistics pegs the two most lucrative female professions in 2009 as pharmacist (median weekly earnings of $1,475) and lawyer ($1,449). The highest paid female professionals in finance are personal financial advisors, who come in 15th place, just behind psychologists (who offer a different sort of counsel). Banks and brokers should promote more women.
Women certainly work in finance; they sit behind two-thirds of the desks. But they are over-represented in operations and administration while trading and money management remain predominantly testosterone-fueled. Women hold only a quarter of securities and commodities sales roles, and a third of the financial advisor and analyst jobs.
The pay differential reflects the smaller number of women at the top of the heap. While women have closed the gap to men generally – median wages are now four-fifths of those made by their male counterparts, up from 62 per cent in 1979 – in finance, median female pay is 70 per cent of the male level. The superstars remain predominantly male too, with last year’s top female financial advisor overseeing a mere $2bn in assets.
Yet very nearly half the country’s millionaires are women, and they control more than half of the wealth. They are better educated than men, and typically outlive them too. Furthermore, more women in finance might make female customers happier. A Boston Consulting Group study of 12,000 women in 21 countries found that of all the industries encountered, financial services leaves them most dissatisfied. Reports of condescension and patronising sales efforts were common. Consumer goods companies have prospered by learning to understand what women want. It is surely time for the finance industry to do the same.
E-mail the Lex team in confidence